Comments for E-Learning in a Nutshell http://elearningnuts.de E-Learning. Knowledge Management. And more... Fri, 24 May 2013 01:30:18 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 Comment on educamp ilmenau by papaschlumpf http://elearningnuts.de/?p=56#comment-11046 papaschlumpf Sat, 10 May 2008 00:38:08 +0000 http://elearningnuts.de/?p=56#comment-11046 This is a prove for my message. Everything can be found in the internet. Even a fakeperson. Nothing less i wanted to say im my session. Think before you post. kind regards Jens (Papaschlumpf) This is a prove for my message. Everything can be found in the internet. Even a fakeperson. Nothing less i wanted to say im my session.
Think before you post.

kind regards Jens (Papaschlumpf)

]]> Comment on Will the world really change? by E-Learning in a Nutshell » Blog Archive » About serendipity http://elearningnuts.de/?p=20#comment-11044 E-Learning in a Nutshell » Blog Archive » About serendipity Fri, 09 May 2008 20:48:57 +0000 http://elearningnuts.de/?p=20#comment-11044 [...] Trouble reading feeds with thunderbird again, so it was just serendipity(!) that I stumbled across Kathy Sierra’s great posting Add a little more random to your product. It’s dealing with a need that was also mentioned here in a recent posting: Filters drive a bigger need for randomness! “We’re all on info overload, and filters are the best antidote […] But all this filtering, tuning, and pruning keeps us stuck! We end up seeing only what we think we want to see—what we’re already familiar with—and slashes our chances for serendipity. And that means slashing our ability to create and innovate, or even to be truly surprised and delighted.” [...] [...] Trouble reading feeds with thunderbird again, so it was just serendipity(!) that I stumbled across Kathy Sierra’s great posting Add a little more random to your product. It’s dealing with a need that was also mentioned here in a recent posting: Filters drive a bigger need for randomness! “We’re all on info overload, and filters are the best antidote […] But all this filtering, tuning, and pruning keeps us stuck! We end up seeing only what we think we want to see—what we’re already familiar with—and slashes our chances for serendipity. And that means slashing our ability to create and innovate, or even to be truly surprised and delighted.” [...]

]]> Comment on re:publica 08 by Jakob http://elearningnuts.de/?p=55#comment-9571 Jakob Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:03:26 +0000 http://elearningnuts.de/?p=55#comment-9571 Zu Lizenzen für Metadaten siehe <a href="http://jakoblog.de/2008/03/12/freie-katalogdaten-und-erschliessungsmittel/" rel="nofollow">dieser Beitrag</a> Zu Lizenzen für Metadaten siehe dieser Beitrag

]]> Comment on Call for Workshops (EC-TEL 2008) by Martin http://elearningnuts.de/?p=51#comment-7557 Martin Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:46:50 +0000 http://elearningnuts.de/?p=51#comment-7557 Thanks a lot for commenting on EC-TEL. the workshops really are special as they enable discussions on themes beyond completely grounded and well researched results. Best, Martin Thanks a lot for commenting on EC-TEL. the workshops really are special as they enable discussions on themes beyond completely grounded and well researched results. Best, Martin

]]> Comment on Leaving Crete by Erik Duval http://elearningnuts.de/?p=40#comment-3734 Erik Duval Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:46:44 +0000 http://elearningnuts.de/?p=40#comment-3734 I'm glad you had a great time - so did I :-) ! I’m glad you had a great time - so did I :-) !

]]> Comment on Leaving Crete by Peter http://elearningnuts.de/?p=40#comment-3610 Peter Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:49:18 +0000 http://elearningnuts.de/?p=40#comment-3610 OK Herr M. Ich glaube, Ihr hattet Spass dort. Sieht gut aus! OK Herr M. Ich glaube, Ihr hattet Spass dort. Sieht gut aus!

]]> Comment on Tell me what you mean! by trb http://elearningnuts.de/?p=38#comment-3152 trb Thu, 20 Sep 2007 09:39:09 +0000 http://elearningnuts.de/?p=38#comment-3152 Why do people often give talks or, more generally, do research without stating their definitions at all? Having no definition of "context" is just one example of bad research. In this case, the context community itself has no common definition. As of CONTEXT-2007 there are over 180 definitions in the literature as counted by Patrick Brézillon. But even if there is no common definition one always should have working definition and also state it ;-) Why do people often give talks or, more generally, do research without stating their definitions at all? Having no definition of “context” is just one example of bad research. In this case, the context community itself has no common definition. As of CONTEXT-2007 there are over 180 definitions in the literature as counted by Patrick Brézillon. But even if there is no common definition one always should have working definition and also state it ;-)

]]> Comment on Egolearner by Martin http://elearningnuts.de/?p=21#comment-754 Martin Sat, 10 Feb 2007 16:43:06 +0000 http://elearningnuts.de/?p=21#comment-754 Karl, Although I commented "it's just a new label", I totally agree with you that labels are important, because they can convey a lot of information, and they can ease communication a lot. And especially in the field of e-Learning, there's a lack of common understanding of terms ("learning object" is a very good example for that). Of course labels can also be abused, but that's a chance one has to take... It's really a very exciting time to see a "new web" emerging in the last years. And it's even more exciting to be involved with all that! Karl,

Although I commented “it’s just a new label”, I totally agree with you that labels are important, because they can convey a lot of information, and they can ease communication a lot. And especially in the field of e-Learning, there’s a lack of common understanding of terms (”learning object” is a very good example for that). Of course labels can also be abused, but that’s a chance one has to take…

It’s really a very exciting time to see a “new web” emerging in the last years. And it’s even more exciting to be involved with all that!

]]> Comment on Egolearner by Karl Kapp http://elearningnuts.de/?p=21#comment-753 Karl Kapp Fri, 09 Feb 2007 21:26:22 +0000 http://elearningnuts.de/?p=21#comment-753 Martin, Labels can be important because they help to frame peoples thinking. Also they help to ensure that everyone is talking about the same thing. Unlike the term "e-learning" which can mean self-paced online instruction, virtual classrooms or even podcasting. With these online learning environments like WOW and SL, the possiblity of learning from someone totally unexpected is what makes these environments exciting and dynamic. It is also something that should cause us to consider how to designing learning events that work within these environments. It is a great time to be involved with online instruction...in all its forms. Martin,

Labels can be important because they help to frame peoples thinking. Also they help to ensure that everyone is talking about the same thing. Unlike the term “e-learning” which can mean self-paced online instruction, virtual classrooms or even podcasting.

With these online learning environments like WOW and SL, the possiblity of learning from someone totally unexpected is what makes these environments exciting and dynamic. It is also something that should cause us to consider how to designing learning events that work within these environments.

It is a great time to be involved with online instruction…in all its forms.

]]> Comment on Egolearner by Martin http://elearningnuts.de/?p=21#comment-661 Martin Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:04:10 +0000 http://elearningnuts.de/?p=21#comment-661 No, the idea is definitely not futuristic, and I'm sure that Kapp knows about all this stuff (Second Life, World of Warcraft etc.) It's just a new LABEL, nothing else. With EGOLEARNER, it's the same thing. But I want this label to be my label ;-) Think of "Web2.0" for a moment... ;-) No, the idea is definitely not futuristic, and I’m sure that Kapp knows about all this stuff (Second Life, World of Warcraft etc.)
It’s just a new LABEL, nothing else. With EGOLEARNER, it’s the same thing. But I want this label to be my label ;-) Think of “Web2.0″ for a moment… ;-)

]]>